The purpose of this practice guide is to help school staff promote positive student behavior and reduce challenging behaviors in U.S. elementary schools -- those serving students in kindergarten through 5th grades. Because most students, including students who receive special education services, spend the majority of their school day in general education classrooms,(11) the teachers in those classrooms play a central role in influencing students' behaviors. Thus, they are a primary focus of this practice guide. Elementary school principals and other administrators also are an audience for the recommendations presented here because they establish the structures and direct the resources needed to support teachers and other school staff in promoting positive environments in classrooms and school-wide.
|
A focus on providing recommendations to help general education teachers deal with problem behaviors in part reflects the fact that many teachers come to the classroom poorly prepared to manage the range of behaviors common among today's students.(15) Indeed, only one-third of principals believe that their teachers are well prepared to maintain order in the classroom, and only 30 percent believe that teachers are well prepared to meet the needs of students with disabilities.(16) Improving teachers' preparation in classroom and behavior management at colleges and universities could be an important step in improving students' behavior at school.
Further, ongoing professional development provided by districts or schools is much more likely to focus on building the instructional skill set of teachers than on strategies for managing classroom behavior. For example, a national study that involved general education teachers who had students with disabilities in their language arts classes indicated that teachers received an average of 60 hours per year of professional development, or 180 hours over a three-year period. Yet only 36 percent of students had teachers who reported receiving at least 8 hours of professional development related to behavior management in that time, whereas 81 percent had teachers who received that level of professional development related to reading and language arts instruction.(17) These data raise the question of whether increasing teachers' capacity to promote positive student behavior and to deal effectively with problem behavior should be a higher priority for both preservice and ongoing professional development.
Recommendations for changes to teacher preparation and teacher professional development programs are beyond the scope of this practice guide. However, such changes must be addressed by institutions of higher education and school districts if teachers and their schools are to be fully successful in addressing the diversity of students' behavioral support needs.
Finally, the charge presented to the panel in developing this guide stressed that we focus on students' behavior. Therefore, any academic outcomes that might be attributed to interventions were not considered to be evidence for their effectiveness. Only behavioral outcomes were considered in evaluating the strength of evidence for an intervention. Also, we did not consider the effects of interventions on adults (parents or teachers) in evaluating the evidence for their effectiveness.
Within these parameters, the panel reached consensus on the five recommendations that follow and on the implementation steps associated with them.
Recommendation 1.
Identify the specifics of the problem behavior and the conditions that prompt and reinforce it
Recommendation 2.
Modify the classroom learning environment to decrease problem behavior
Recommendation 3.
Teach and reinforce new skills to increase appropriate behavior and preserve a positive classroom climate
Recommendation 4.
Draw on relationships with professional colleagues and students' families for continued guidance and support
Recommendation 5.
Assess whether school-wide behavior problems warrant adopting school-wide strategies or programs and, if so, implement ones shown to reduce negative and foster positive interactions
Footnotes
11. Wagner, Marder, and Chorost (2004).
12. Kutash, Duchnowski, and Lynn (2006).
13. Commission on Chronic Illness (1957). The three-tiered model of behavioral supports includes an emphasis on matching the intensity of the intervention to the severity of the behavior problem, including primary or universal (school-wide) strategies, secondary targeted intervention efforts, and tertiary or intensive individual support for students with the most severe problems (Sugai et al. 2000).
14. Office of Special Education Programs (2008); Sugai et al. (2000); Sugai, Sprague, et al. (2000).
15. Levine (2006); MetLife, Inc. (2006).
16. Levine (2006).
17. Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study, Wave 1 Teacher Survey (2001).