|
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Home > Administrator's Desk Channel > Administrator's Desk Archive >School To Work > School Administrators Article |
| SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS ARTICLE |
|
School-to-Work: Connecting Schools and Career Decision-Making Read about The School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994. Included: Descriptions of a handful of exemplary school-to-work programs across the grades! On May 4, 1994, President Bill Clinton signed the School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994, establishing "a national framework within which all States can create statewide School-to-Work Opportunities systems that…offer opportunities for all students to participate in a performance-based education and training program…." As a result of that act, schools across the country instituted programs designed to actively prepare students for the future job market. WHY DO I NEED TO KNOW THAT? Passage of the School-to-Work Opportunities Act was based in part on Congressional findings that:
In addition, national studies reported that:
In short, students did not see a connection between the classroom and the workplace, and few schools or businesses were providing that connection. The School-to-Work Opportunities Act was an attempt to address those issues. OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL! The School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994 did not establish a program for career-based education. Rather it provided the funds that allowed states to develop their own programs. Consequently, though many programs shared common elements, each was unique and each was determined by the needs of its own students. Some school-to-work programs focused on teacher training, technology education, or the use of technology for distance learning. Others provided direct student instruction, including specific career information and the administration of interest and ability inventories. Many provided those resources as well as work-based activities and employment opportunities. The National School-to-Work Learning and Information Center cited some exemplary school-based and community-based programs that represented the various types of experiences available to students. They included --
THE PUBLIC RESPONSE Whatever form they took, all school-to-work programs were directed toward helping young people see a connection between their performance in school and the opportunities that available to them after graduation. Not all components of the programs were greeted with equal enthusiasm, however. · Some parents claimed that, by the use of interest and ability inventories, school-to-work directed students into careers they did not want or would not enjoy. · Others claimed that the programs encouraged students to make career decisions too early, thus forcing them into educational paths that could make later, different decisions difficult. · Labor leaders warned that school-to-work programs focused on the needs of businesses and ignored the rights of workers. · And some educators feared that a curriculum based too-rigidly on career skills robbed students of knowledge and activities that foster their growth as individuals and as citizens of a free society. Despite those objections, the overwhelming majority of Americans who knew about school-to-work programs appeared to support them. A nationwide poll conducted by Jobs for the Future, a workforce training research group, found that three-fourths of those who knew about the school-to-work initiative were in favor of it. And 96 percent of respondents to a survey on education and workforce issues believed "a system of education that would provide a strong academic foundation for every student, hands-on learning experiences, and a learning opportunity for every student to practice what he/she learns in a work-based setting to be desirable." Early reports on the success of several school-to-work programs appeared to support that viewpoint. A study of high school students in Philadelphia found that students involved in their school-to-work program achieved higher GPA standings than students not involved. And Boston students who participated in that city's program were found to have a higher employment rate and higher earnings after graduation than students who did not participate. The students themselves agreed. More than 90 percent of teens who participated in a Teen Attitudes Toward Work survey said school would be more interesting and meaningful if it were taught in connection with careers. ADDITIONAL SCHOOL-TO-WORK INTERNET RESOURCES
Article by Linda Starr
Updated 1/19/2005
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Copyright 1996-2009 by Education World, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Home | About Us | Reprint Rights | Help | Site Guide | Partners | Contact Us | Privacy Policy |