CRACKINGWhat if my mother, instead of being consistent, had been pretty consistent. Four out of five times, no meant no. But, one out of five times she “cracked.” Maybe she had a good excuse -- she was busy or stressed or distracted. In a moment of weakness, she blurted,“All right! Here, you can have it! Just go outside, and leave me alone! I’m tired of listening to your yammering!” If my mother had cracked, she would have taught me the following lessons:
DISCIPLINE BEFORE INSTRUCTIONOne of your basic jobs in the classroom will be to set limits on student disruptions -- to say “no” to typical, everyday “goofing off.” We will focus on the most common disruption, “talking to neighbors.” Imagine yourself in class as students work at their seats. According to your classroom rules in this format, “talking to neighbors” clearly represents goofing off. As you help a student, you look up to see two students on the far side of the room chatting away instead of working.
Let’s deal with your priorities before we consider your actions. In the classroom, the following priority must govern your decision making at all times: It is not optional. It is a cornerstone of effective management.
Placing discipline before instruction is something that most teachers would readily accept. After all, it’s only logical. Does this make sense?:
How about this? Indeed, most teachers would agree, at least at a logical level, that discipline should come before instruction. Why, then, do so few teachers act that way? THE MOMENT OF TRUTHBeware! Weenie-ism can be far more subtle in the classroom than it is at home. Let’s imagine, for example, that you’re helping a student -- Robert-- with a complex piece of work, such as a geometry proof. He’s lost somewhere in the middle of the proof among the theorems and axioms and corollaries. You’ve been working with Robert for a couple of minutes, and you are nearing closure. Given another twenty seconds, Robert will be able to progress on his own.
At that moment, out of the corner of your eye you catch two students on the far side of the room talking instead of working. It’s not a big disruption. It isn’t even bothering students nearby. Now, be utterly candid with yourself as you imagine what to do next. During training, a roomful of experienced teachers will respond in unison, “Finish helping Robert.” Of course you want to finish helping Robert! After all, you have made an emotional investment and an intellectual investment as well as an investment of time. You are so close to completion. Robert almost has it. Consequently, most teachers will return to helping Robert. In the “moment of truth,” most teachers will choose instruction over discipline. The Students’ PerspectiveNow, let’s look at the situation from the students’ perspective. It’s the beginning of the school year, and they are trying to figure out who you are. The class just saw you make a choice. They saw you look up to observe two students goofing off, and then they saw you return to Robert.
From the students’ perspective, answer the following question: You might as well make the following public announcement to the students: “Class, do you remember what I said at the beginning of the school year about high standards and time-on-task. Well, as you know, talk is cheap. When you look up to see one of your rules being broken, you are on the horns of a dilemma. If you act, your rules become reality. If you fail to act, your rules are nothing but hot air. This is your moment of truth. If you waffle, you become a “weenie.” A weenie is a magnet for brat behavior. SEE AND THEN ACTThinking when you should be acting is fatal. If a student has stepped over the line, you either do something about it or you “pull your punch.” Thinking at this juncture produces dithering instead of doing. To eliminate dithering, don’t think. Discipline always come before instruction -- period! If you stop to think at this point, your thoughts will be rationalizations for staying with Robert. Here are some truly irrelevant thoughts that might come to mind.
How big is the disruption? That is irrelevant. When you see unacceptable behavior, you either deal with it or not. The disruption typically will be small -- “talking to neighbors” in most cases. Of course the problem is small. Of course the lesson is important. Of course discipline management is inconvenient. But you cannot turn a blind eye to disruptions. “No means no” every time, or it means less than nothing. Stop dithering and do your job, or quit kidding yourself and admit that you really are a weenie. DON’T CONSULT YOUR FEELINGSDiscipline management is a game you play out of your head, not out of your gut. Your boundaries coincide with your definition of unacceptable behavior. They have nothing to do with how you feel. Feelings are inconstant by their very nature. You cannot respond, for example, because you feel yourself “losing your patience.” Your patience will be a function of
YOU MAKE THE RULESI don’t make the rules for your classroom. You do. Different lesson formats have different rules. Green teachers often think of classroom rules as a kind of behavioral wish list. They make rules based on what they want, rather than on what they can afford. More experienced teachers know that each classroom rule comes with a high price tag attached.
If you are to be consistent, you must respond every time you see a rule infraction. Consistency, therefore, requires that you adhere to the following “rule of rules:” Enforcement always will be an intrusion that requires you to stop what you’re doing. Before you make a rule, therefore, imagine yourself enforcing it -- every time. Then, ask yourself, “Is it worth the price?” INCONSISTENCY AND HARSHNESSGreen teachers who have not yet raised a family have a particularly hard time taking consistency as seriously as they should. Their primary focus is usually relationship building. Rule enforcement tends to take a back seat. Teachers who have raised a family know all about “infantile omnipotence.” They’ve learned to combine affection with firmness and consistency in order to create stable boundaries. For teachers who have little experience with that balancing act, the notion that boundaries cannot move, that there are no “degrees of consistency”, seems overly rigid. Nevertheless, your ability to be nurturant ultimately will be a function of your ability to be consistent. For example, when you turn a blind eye to chit-chat, you allow “talking to neighbors” to self-reinforce. Don’t be surprised when the problem reoccurs -- and reoccurs -- and reoccurs. When you’ve finally “had it” and intervene, you’ll be attempting to suppress a behavior that you participated in building.
The management of behavior problems will follow one of two paths in any classroom: If you are inconsistent, you must use larger and larger consequences to govern misbehavior. In the final analysis, the price you pay for your own inconsistency is a reduction in your capacity to nurture.
Article by Dr. Fred Jones 10/23/2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||