![]() |
||||||||||
Home > Professional Development Channel > Professional Development Article Archive > Professional Development Columnists > Fred Jones's Tools for Teaching > Fred Jones Article |
||||||
| FRED JONES | ||||||
![]()
|
|
One of the most cost-effective forms of faculty collaboration is the development of a “School Site Procedures Manual.” That manual shares the wisdom and experience of teachers in the form of protocols for each routine that faculty members regularly employ. Writing the manual stimulates sharing among teachers. That helps solidify commitment to key routines as it hones the most efficient way of implementing each one. Uniform procedures pay additional dividends whenever students transition from teacher to teacher or from one grade level to another.
The teaching of classroom procedures is time-consuming. First, each routine must be taught thoroughly. And second, there are many of them to teach.
Yet, in spite of the initial investment, classroom routines are one of your primary labor-saving devices. They reduce your stress each time you have the class do something. Over the long run, the investment in training pays for itself many times over.
Research has repeatedly shown that teachers with the best run classrooms spend most of the first two weeks of the semester teaching their procedures and routines. Teachers who do not make that investment deal with the same behavior problems over and over all semester long. It is a case of
Pay me now, or pay me later. Do it right, or do it all year long.
As logical as that might sound, few teachers actually make the investment. In fact, the older the students, the less investment we make. The teachers who make the greatest investment are, of course, primary teachers. They spend half their time teaching procedures and routines. The investment is still considerable, although spotty, in the middle grades. But by junior high and high school, the teaching of procedures has typically become perfunctory -- just some announcements on the first day of class.
|
When secondary teachers are asked why they don’t spend more time teaching procedures, they say, “They should know how to behave by now.” When pressed, those teachers say such things as “Spend the first two weeks on rules -- you have to be kidding! I don’t have two weeks for that. I would never make up the time.” Or “I can see doing it with the little kids. But doing it with older kids seems like a complete waste of time. How often do they have to be taught these things?”
Consequently, the teaching of classroom procedures and routines is one of the most neglected areas of classroom management. That lack of proactive management will cost teachers dearly as the semester progresses.
While teachers’ conviction that “they should know how to behave by now” is sincere, it also is naive. Students know exactly how to behave in class. They always have. The question is, do they have to?
Two of the most common complaints from secondary teachers concerning student behavior are 1) talking while I am talking, and 2) interrupting other students when they are talking. Those two problems represent primary grade-level socialization. How many times do you think teachers have dealt with those issues before a student reaches high school?
You should know from your own experience in school that students adjust their behavior to match the standards of each teacher. If your second period teacher lets you talk and fool around while your third period teacher does not, you will talk in second period if you want to and cool it in third period.
The standards in any classroom, to put it bluntly, are defined by whatever the students can get away with. If you do not take the time to carefully teach your rules, routines, and standards, you will get whatever the students feel like giving you.
This is a classic example of proactive versus reactive management. A wise teacher knows that spending time on procedures early in the semester saves time and energy in the long run. Prevention is always cheaper than remediation.
|
Article by Dr. Fred Jones
Education World®
Copyright © 2006 Education World
08/17/2007
|
| ||
|
||
|
||
|
Copyright 1996-2008 by Education World, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Home | About Us | Reprint Rights | Help | Site Guide | Fellows | Contact Us | Privacy Policy |