Home > Technology Integration Channel > Technology Integration Archives > Technology Integration Columnists > Doug Johnson Archive > Doug Johnson Article

Doug Johnson's Tech Proof

Engage or Entertain?

It's a fallacy to believe that today's students are unhappy unless they are entertained.

In last January’s PBS FRONTLINE show, Growing Up Online,* a classroom teacher lamented that because of the amount of time kids spend online, they now need to be entertained if you want to hold their attention. It's not an uncommon complaint. I hear it often during workshops when I ask teachers to list some qualities of today’s learner.

But I don't believe it is a valid complaint. The terms "entertain" and "engage" are being confused. There are important distinctions. The dictionary definitions hint at some:

Engage: to hold the attention of; to induce to participate
Entertain: to provide entertainment (amusement or diversion provided especially by performers)
Merriam-Webster Online

• Entertainment's primary purpose is to create an enjoyable experience; engagement’s primary purpose is to focus attention so learning occurs.
• Entertainment is ephemeral, often frivolous; engagement creates long-lasting results and deals with important issues.
• Entertainment needs have little relevance to the reader/watcher/listener; engaging experiences most often relate directly to the learner.
• Entertainment is an escape from problems; engagement involves solving problems. When problems are a part of entertainment, the solution is given; when problems are a part of an engaging experience, the learner supplies the solution.
• Entertainment results through the creativity of others; engagement asks for creativity on the part of the learner.
• Perhaps the greatest distinction is that entertainment is often passive, whereas engagement is active or interactive.

I am not convinced that today’s kids need constant entertainment any more or less than any of us do. But they are more insistent on learning that is engaging.

When my teen-age son disappeared for hours on end, it was not to watch television (a passive form of entertainment), but to play video games, chat, and interact with Internet sites (active forms of engagement). And he is typical -- today’s students are watching less television -- or they’re multi-tasking while the tube is on. Peter Grunwald, in Children, Families, and the Internet 2004), reported that “Thirteen-to-17-year-olds average 3.1 hours a day watching TV and 3.5 hours with digital media." Passive viewing is losing ground to more interactive experiences. Imagine that.

Remember that there is a difference between entertaining and engaging the learner. We all need to make the distinction. And we need to make engagement the focus of our instructional strategy improvements. Today’s students are more demanding, but we need to ask ourselves carefully what they really are insisting on in their classrooms.

Meet Doug Johnson Doug Johnson has been the Director of Media and Technology for the Mankato Public Schools since 1991 and has served as an adjunct faculty member of Minnesota State University, Mankato since 1990. His teaching experience has included work in grades K-12 in schools both here and in Saudi Arabia. He is the author of four books -- The Indispensable Librarian; The Indispensable Teacher's Guide to Computer Skills; Teaching Right from Wrong in the Digital Age; and Machines Are the Easy Part; People Are the Hard Part. His regular columns appear in Library Media Connection, Leading & Learning and The School Administrator magazines and his articles have appeared in more than 40 books and periodicals. Doug has conducted workshops and given presentations for more than 130 organizations throughout the United States as well as in Malaysia, Kenya, Thailand, Germany, Qatar, Canada, the UAE and Australia. He has held a variety of leadership positions in state and national organizations, including ISTE and AASL.

Education World®
Copyright © 2008 Education World

04/04/2008