A report from the National Trust for Historic Preservation (NTHP) makes
a case for renovating old school buildings instead of razing them. Although
demolition might be the wisest choice in some instances, the NTHP offers
resources for helping school boards decide whether to raze or renovate.
Education World spoke with members of three communities that have faced
that dilemma. Included: Resources from the NTHP and
the National Clearinghouse on Educational Facilities.
In the report Historic Neighborhood Schools in the Age of
Sprawl: Why Johnny Can't Walk, the National Trust for Historic
Preservation offered recommendations to help school districts
and communities make wise choices when answering the "Prehistoric
or worth preserving?" question.
* Eliminate funding biases that favor new construction.
* Eliminate arbitrary acreage standards that undermine the
ability of established communities to retain and upgrade older
schools.
* Avoid building massive schools in remote locations that
stimulate sprawl.
* Encourage school districts to cooperate with other institutions
to share playgrounds and parking areas.
* Establish guidelines to ensure adequate school building
maintenance.
* Require feasibility studies comparing the costs of new schools
with the costs of renovating existing schools.
* Ensure that a minimum of 50 percent of the students can
walk or bike to school.
* When a school is no longer suitable for teaching kids, make
plans for an adaptive use.
* Provide education in school-renovation techniques. |
|
What is the significance of razing an older school building? A national
report suggests there is a lot at stake and that school districts considering
demolition over renovation should take a second glance at the numbers. The
report cites examples from around the country to suggest that rehabilitating
older buildings is possible -- even preferable -- without breaking the bank.
That's not the route many school districts take, however. When faced
with bankrolling extensive renovations to older schools, the easy -- and
in some cases less expensive -- way to go is to construct a new building
altogether. Older schools often lack proper wiring for technology and
do not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. New schools, some
believe, create better learning environments too.
Newer is not always better, though. The National Trust for Historic
Preservation (NTHP) compiled a 52-page report, Historic
Neighborhood Schools in the Age of Sprawl: Why Johnny Can't Walk (see
sidebar), that underscores what communities lose when they raze historic
schools and replace them with new state-of-the-art complexes.
Schools that dot downtown areas have become a beacon of economic vitality,
according to the report. In Billings, Montana, for example, PTA President
Ann L. Clancy thinks of the Broadwater Elementary School as a repository
of the neighborhood's history and heritage. "These schools were built
at a critical time when Billings was growing and starting to thrive. They
represent a different way of life -- a time when schools were 'right there'
in the neighborhood." she said.
Clancy drives past the schoolyard these days and honks her car horn
when she sees her daughter outside playing. "Older and historic schools
tend to be smaller, more 'high touch,' and easier to interact with. They
are from an era when neighborhoods had an identity," Clancy explained.
"They anchor neighborhoods."
According to the NTHP report, when a district abandons a historic school,
the new school often goes up on the outskirts of town. The move from the
neighborhood creates an emotional -- as well as actual -- distance between
the town and its school, between kids and families and their schools.
Kids can't walk to school, which adds to the busing expense line in the
district's budget.
Razing a downtown school doesn't usually result in a space large enough
to meet current zoning codes for constructing a new school on the site.
In Billings, the site standards call for 1 acre for every 100 students
plus 10 acres for an elementary school, 25 acres for a middle school,
and 35 acres for a high school. To do that in downtown Billings would
mean knocking out six city blocks, according to the NTHP report.
Zoning codes such as those in Billings, along with state funding formulas,
push districts to construct rather than renovate, the NHTP believes.
Broadwater Elementary School was built in 1909. It is located in an historic,
established neighborhood adjacent to downtown Billings. The school has
the high ceilings, large windows, and solid masonry and concrete construction
typical of that time.
Since 1998, four historic schools in Billings have been targeted for
possible closure because of the district's need to respond to declining
neighborhood enrollments, which corresponds to lower state aid, Clancy
said. "Some members [of the school board] believe that to build a new
school, it is necessary to close an older school in an area of declining
enrollment," she added.
In Billings, Clancy said, diminishing funds force the school board to
decide between setting aside money to renovate older buildings or buying
textbooks and teaching materials. "As you can imagine, maintenance is
often deferred on older and historic buildings, which further contributes
to the bias that old buildings are not good learning environments or that
new is always better," she explained.
The NHTP added historic neighborhood schools to its annual 11
Most Endangered Historic Places list. According to the report, the
list was created to "alert the public to various threats to these irreplaceable
community landmarks." The report cites multiple examples of struggles
over whether to rehabilitate schools or build anew.
"The National Trust does not argue that every historic school building
can be or even should be preserved. Many such schools can be -- and have
been -- however, and we believe that school districts often dismiss renovation
options too quickly," said Constance Beaumont, NHTP director of state
and local policy and one of the authors of the report. Beaumont does say
that neighborhood schools are the "glue" that can tie neighborhoods together.
The report argues that a school's age does not automatically point to
demolition. People should value its characteristics and place in the community.
"Schools were once thought of as important civic landmarks built to last
a century. They represented community investments that inspired civic
pride and participation in public life," said Richard Moe, NTHP president.
"Many of today's newer schools resemble big-box warehouses. Their architecture
reflects little pride, and they sometimes have a life-span of a mere 30
years."
The report also refers to studies that indicate that students learn
best when the school is central to the life and learning of the community.
One roadblock to preserving older school buildings, the report states,
is the so-called "60 percent rule." That rule of thumb commands that if
the cost of renovating an older school exceeds 60 percent of the cost
of a new school, the school district should build a new school if the
district wants to receive financial assistance from the state.
"The problem with such arbitrary percentage rules is that they prevent
a full cost analysis by state and local governments and arbitrarily eliminate
sound renovation projects. Certain new construction costs -- items such
as land acquisition, water and sewer line extensions, transportation and
road work, for example -- may not be factored into the comparison," the
report states. "If those costs were considered, renovation projects might
meet the percentage rule more easily."
Beaumont believes we are at the beginning of a shift toward preserving
older school buildings. "Many historic schools are stunningly beautiful
structures and thus a source of pride to the community," she said. "When
people are proud of their community, they are usually more willing to
stay and invest in it."
Among the preservation success stories cited in the NTHP report is Lincoln
High School in Manitowoc, Wisconsin. The school was built in 1923 on the
shore of Lake Michigan, one of the community's older residential areas.
"Lincoln High is such a community landmark that the board of education
never considered replacing it," said Joan Graff, the school district's
public information specialist. "Generations of citizens consider it their
school." Instead of razing Lincoln, the community invested $15 million
in large-scale infrastructure upgrades and cosmetic changes in 1999. The
preservation keeps the character of the original structure while supporting
the educational needs of 21st-century students, Graff said.
The Manitowoc school district has had it both ways. Another school in
the district, Jefferson Elementary School, was built in 1887 and rebuilt
in 1934. Community members acknowledged that Jefferson did not have the
same characteristics or inspire sentiment that Lincoln High School did.
The school was a "fire trap," according to some people in the community.
In 1996, the community razed the school and constructed a new school on
the same site.
Jefferson Elementary could not be upgraded to meet codes or be made
accessible for people with disabilities, Graff said. "Frankly, it was
not a safe environment for students and staff." Although the public agreed
that the school had to go, there was a strong push to keep the new school
in the neighborhood.
"The rebuilt Jefferson has meant a lot to the neighborhood," Graff told
Education World. "Once this neighborhood had a broken-down school that
was dingy and unattractive; it now has a beautiful new structure that
elevates the entire neighborhood."
In rural Claremont, New Hampshire, a city of 13,000 people, the school
board faced the question of what to do with three almost 100-year-old
elementary schools nestled deep inside neighborhoods. Around 1995, the
district created a plan to construct additions on some newer elementary
schools and close the three older ones.
According to board chairwoman Candace Crawford, the historic significance
of the buildings did not come into play when the district voted to spend
$6.6 million on the consolidation plan. The cost of renovating the buildings
was becoming astronomical and would probably get worse. "The buildings
needed so much work," she said.
North Street and Way Schools were deeded to the city for $1; today,
those buildings house a Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center office and
Head Start respectively. The additions to Maple Avenue, Disnard, and Bluff
Elementary Schools and Claremont Middle School meant that pupils would
be bused farther, but they represented the relief of what was becoming
a liability to the school district.
Crawford believes there would have been more of an outcry if the board
had suggested demolishing the historic buildings.
On the other hand, the district has entertained notions of building
a new high school on the outskirts of the city, but the alumni association,
the oldest in the country, has a strong attachment to the downtown location
of Stevens High School.
In 1998, the Stevens High School staff was left scrambling for classroom
space after chunks of ceiling fell into the auditorium. After extensive
work on the roof and ceiling, the board toyed with the idea of relocating
the high school. There was no way to tear down the school and build a
new facility on the site because of what Crawford calls a "postage-stamp"
sized lot. "We certainly couldn't use [that lot] for a school," said Crawford.
"Stevens certainly is a center point. It is an important part of the town."
Article by Ryan Francis
Education World®
Copyright © 2005 Education World
Originally published 05/25/2001; updated 06/08/2005
|