Husband-and-wife team Gil Reavill and Jean Zimmerman, authors of Raising Our Athletic Daughters: How Sports Can Build Self-Esteem and Save Girls' Lives, explain why girls and sports are a winning combination and what you can do to level the playing fields for the girls in your life.
In Raising Our Athletic Daughters: How Sports Can Build Self-Esteem
and Save Girls' Lives, husband-and-wife author team Gil Reavill and
Jean Zimmerman demonstrate how sports empower girls and create positive
self-identity. "If Ophelia had been on the swim team," they wrote, referring
to Mary Pipher's book Reviving Ophelia, "she might not have needed
reviving." Education World chatted with Reavill and Zimmerman about why
sports are so important for girls and how educators and parents can help
girls develop the skills and confidence to play and compete.
Education World: Why did you choose to write about girls and
sports?
Jean Zimmerman: Part of the reason we chose to write about
girls and sports was personal. We have an elementary school-age daughter
who is extremely active -- loves to play soccer and basketball, swim,
do gymnastics and just generally run around. When we began to read the
work of thinkers like Mary Pipher, as parents we were naturally concerned
about the future emotional and psychological and physical health of our
own kid. At the same time, just before we began working on our book, there
was a groundswell of interest in professional women's sports -- the Olympics,
the WNBA, etc. We wondered What link could be established between the
two areas -- girls' self-esteem and their physical activity? We looked
around at the research, and though it was encouraging, we saw a lack of
documentation on a one-to-one, face-to-face level -- in other words, very
few people were going out to talk to girls themselves about their own
experiences and feelings. So that's what we decided to do.
EW: Do you see sports as equal to the other potentially soul-saving
activities Mary Pipher refers to, such as a deep interest in the arts
or a political cause, or do sports stand apart in some way?
Gil Reavill: We encounter variations of this question all the
time. "My daughter is really into chess -- she's passionate about it.
Do I drag her away from the chessboard to go play soccer?" Anything that
kids are passionate about can be good for their self-esteem. Self-esteem
is not something that can be "given" to a girl, fairy-godmother-like,
at the wave of a wand. Self-esteem comes from working at something and
getting better at it. So chess, Irish step-dancing, drawing -- they all
can fit the bill. That said, athletic participation does have a crucial
element especially good for girls. Studies have shown that girls in sports
tend to score higher on tests that measure positive body image. Athletic
participation can let girls experience what their bodies can do, in contrast
to the social emphasis on how girls' bodies look. So many of the problems
associated with female adolescence, such as eating disorders, self-mutilation,
drug and alcohol abuse, key into how girls feel about their bodies. Participation
in sports seems to help them develop positive body image.
EW: I was struck by your explanation of how the development
of physical abilities -- the simple process of learning a contralateral,
or opposite-side, overhand throw, for example -- can be arrested through
insidious messages very young girls pick up about gender-appropriate behaviors.
Are there toys, activities, or attitudes that might seem innocuous to
parents and early educators that in fact deliver destructive messages
to young girls?
Zimmerman: It's not that any "girl" toys -- such as makeup
sets or Barbie dolls or ultra-feminine dress-up clothes for fantasy play
-- in themselves are bad, but when we give little girls the option of
playing with those things exclusively, we shortchange them. Girls too
want active, rough-and-tumble play, but they won't kick or throw a ball
if they don't have a ball to play with. There is another element too:
Girls, just like boys, need to develop the skills of throwing, catching,
kicking in order to enjoy playing later on in team competition. If a kid
gets out on the field and her friends know how to do the basic things
and she doesn't, she's likely to feel bad, and her enthusiasm will probably
be somewhat dampened. Then she is more likely to quit.
EW: Why are noncompetitive sports important for girls' development
in the early years?
Zimmerman: We are living at a time when there is less and less
unorganized, informal, unsupervised play by little kids -- neighborhood
pick-up games, just fooling around ... and that's too bad.
Reavill: I believe there is too much emphasis on competition
too early on. Every survey of kids that asks why they play sports lists
"having fun" as number one -- and "winning" never makes the top ten. But
there is a hidden message here. "Having fun" does not necessarily mean
kids are not learning valuable lessons. In fact, "fun" for a young child
-- and an older one, for that matter -- often means trying something and
getting better at it. And this is what a good sports experience for a
younger child is all about.
EW: There seem to be two different approaches to girls' sports
beyond the elementary school years. Girls can continue to participate
and play simply for the fun of it, or they can enter the realm of more
serious competition. What are the advantages and possible shortcomings
or pitfalls of each approach?
Zimmerman: Some girls just want to compete. We spoke with teen
athletes aspiring to an elite level in their field who were driven by
a love of excelling -- and of winning. They wanted to be the best at their
sport; they would not settle for less. And their competitiveness was central
to the pleasure they took in physical activity. That is not an image that
our generation -- fortysomething -- necessarily grew up with. Some people
our age are not comfortable with the idea that girls can be just as competitive
as boys. But in many cases it's true, and we're just going to have to
readjust our expectations.
Reavill: It's important to realize that in raising an athletic
daughter, even one who wants to play just for the fun of it, you must
offset a whole barrage of anachronistic social messages that say that
girls shouldn't play sports -- messages that are still potent even today.
So the girls who approach sports casually might tend to drop out, and
might need encouragement to stay involved. For the more serious athletes,
the "professionalization" of high school sports is something we as a society
need to decry, not just in girls programs. It ruins the fun for little
kids -- and even bigger sisters -- if it is too competitive. Everyone
has horror stories of inappropriate adult behavior at Little League games
or on the sidelines at a soccer game. Adults need to find a happy medium
between encouragement and overinvolvement.
EW: Speaking of the "professionalization" of high school sports,
in most schools, girls have to be fairly skilled to get on the varsity
teams. What other avenues are open to girls who want to continue to play
for fun?
Reavill: We need to have more opportunities for girls who want
to play just for the fun of it -- club sports, intramural sports, junior
varsity. Title IX cracked the door open, and now sports for girls who
play at elite levels are beginning to be well served. Let's give that
sector of female athletics -- the varsity level -- a solid C. But for
other girls, who don't play at the varsity level but still want to get
out there, our nation's schools rate at best a D minus.
EW: Many girls you spoke with had quite a functional "I'm in
control" sense about their own bodies. Yet you devote some serious space
in the book to life-threatening eating disorders -- a real and persistent
problem among participants in certain sports such as swimming, gymnastics,
and distance running. How can coaches and parents encourage girls in those
sports and help them avoid the damaging triggers to weight and
body-image preoccupations?
Reavill: The so-called body sports are the ones where athletes
are most at-risk for eating disorders -- they include swimming, tennis,
and gymnastics -- any sport where girls' bodies seem in some way to be
exposed or on display. But as more scholarship money filters into girls'
sports and the stakes are raised, certain pernicious attitudes and practices
have started to become widespread. We have heard of high school volleyball
programs, for example, that use body-fat measurements as part of their
training regimen. We feel this is wrong-headed and potentially injurious
to the athletes involved.
EW: From early childhood on, there are persistent problems
in providing girls with "maximum access and opportunity" to sports. How
should educators and parents teach boys to be part of the solution? Are
coed sports the answer?
Zimmerman: Boys are learning on their own -- in fact, boys
are much more supportive of their athletic peers who are girls than parents
in our generation may assume. As boys grow up today and see girls their
age taking part in athletics as a natural everyday occurrence, they respect
and admire the girls. So, yes, we should encourage boys and girls to play
together from a young age, and even coed teams up through adolescence
-- when there's a divergence of physical capabilities -- can be very positive,
given fair coaching. Another factor that is really changing boys' attitudes
is seeing high-achieving female athletes in the media. Boys are growing
up now with posters of Sheryl Swoopes on their walls -- we think this
will naturally translate into a more egalitarian view of women and men
in other aspects of life.
EW: Can you give some hands-on advice to educators who want
to see girls embrace and continue to play sports? What should schools
do for adolescents right now?
Zimmerman: Give girls more options. Make sure facilities, playing
times, uniforms, and field space is adequate. Look at what is going on
in your school: Does the boys' team get new uniforms each year while the
girls make do with hand-me-downs? Does the boys' team take the bus to
events while the girls carpool? Do the boys use the gym on Friday nights
-- when family and friends make up a good crowd -- while girls' games
are scheduled for Wednesdays?
EW: Increased self-esteem, confidence, strong bodies, strong
minds -- we all want those things for our daughters. You make an eloquent
and compelling case for making sports an integral part of girls' lives.
What are the three most important things a parent can do to raise an athletic
daughter?
Reavill: The first thing is to teach your daughter to throw
overhand. Next, get active yourself. Kids learn the most from watching
their parents. Make physical activity a family affair, and turn off the
TV! Finally, if your daughter displays less interest in one particular
sport -- say, tennis -- don't jump to the conclusion she's just not athletic.
Give her choices; have soccer balls, skateboards, field hockey gear --
to list just a few examples -- available. Consider sports equipment not
as a special gift but as essential tools, like pencils and notebooks.
Help her see that there is a whole world of athletic options out there!
ADDITIONAL ONLINE RESOURCES FOR GIRLS AND
WOMEN IN SPORTS
The following organizations study and promote the involvement of girls
and women in all types of sports and physical activities:
Melpomene Institute
Through research, publications, and education, this organization helps
girls and women of all ages link physical activity and health.
Women's Sports Foundation This national, nonprofit, member-based
organization is dedicated to increasing opportunities for girls and
women in sports and fitness through education, advocacy, recognition,
and grants.