You are here

Nelson Mandela’s Legacy: Equity-Focused Educational Change

EducationWorld is pleased to present this article contributed by C.M. Rubin. The piece is part of Rubin's online interview series Global Search for Education, in which she joins globally renowned thought leaders as they explore big-picture education questions. For this series and her other online series "How Will We Read?", she received a 2011 Upton Sinclair award. Rubin is also the author of three bestselling books, including The Real Alice in Wonderland.

Left to right: Helen Janc Malone,
C.M. Rubin and Jonathan Jansen

“I hold a Bachelor’s Degree in Arts…” - Nelson Mandela

Those were the words Nelson Mandela used in 1964 to open his 10,699-word defense in the historic Rivonia Trial. “It expresses both an achievement and an ideal worth striving for,” explains Jonathan Jansen, Vice-Chancellor and Rector of the University of the Free State in central South Africa, President of the South African Institute of Race Relations, and a Fellow of the Academy of Science of the Developing World.

In that year, only 298 Africans passed “matric” with university entrance, and in this society with a turbulent racial past, only 98 had been awarded bachelor’s degrees in the previous year. “Even today,” continues Jansen, “holding a first degree would distinguish a young South African from disadvantaged communities; in the 1960s, such an achievement would have been stupendous.”

Mandela’s education legacy continues, and Jonathan Jansen’s work on equity-focused educational change is part of that legacy. He seeks to turn around some of the most dysfunctional schools in rural South Africa, using a strong mentorship-based model of change. Additionally, Helen Janc Malone, whose new book—Leading Educational Change: Global Issues, Challenges, and Lessons on Whole-System Reform—features Jansen’s work, weighs in. Helen is Director of Institutional Advancement at the Institute for Educational Leadership in Washington, D.C.
 

Why didn’t Mandela’s government, once it came into power, force integration in all schools?

South Africa had a negotiated political settlement, which in spirit and content pre-empted any radical reform of economy, society and education. The Constitution enshrined the rights of all South Africans, such as language rights, and the new Schools Act legislation ceded considerable power to school governing bodies—Black and White—to determine things like the language policy and enrollment levels of a school, provided of course there was no discrimination. In addition, the new government wanted to ensure a strong public school sector and feared that any strong intervention in former White schools would cause these middle-class communities to establish their own private institutions. In any event, many (though not all) White schools had allowed for gradual racial integration without reaching that tipping point where Black student numbers grew to the point of causing White flight. Where that happened, all White schools became all Black schools almost overnight. White Afrikaans schools, often the most conservative of all types of White schools, would often remain dominant White using language rights (Afrikaans) as a shield to defend the status quo. Rural White Afrikaans schools, often with poor students and empty classrooms, came under huge pressure to admit Black students from overcrowded township schools; in many cases, this led to parallel English classes for Black students, not without racial conflict in many cases. Overall, the march to racial integration in all schools continues, and it is simply a matter of time, given the overwhelmingly large Black student numbers, that all schools will be racially integrated without the need for too much political pressure.
 

What types of public schools currently exist in South Africa?

The first major differentiator of public schools is race. More than 80% of schools are exclusively Black, considering the demographics and history of South Africa. This is unlikely to change, given White racial consciousness and set patterns of residential segregation. The only changes to be expected will continue to be in the minority of White schools where racial integration has been uneven but will, in time, result in Black majority schools as well.

Photos courtesy of Univ. of the Free State

The second differentiator is class. About 20% of South African schools are middle-class White schools with more racial integration in the former White English schools and less so in White Afrikaans schools. Middle-class schools have raised more and more of their school funds from parent contributions as state funding to these public schools declined.

The more wealthy White public schools are mainly English with smaller numbers of Black students, given the exorbitant school fees that exclude most Black students. Black schools are further subdivided by government according to five “quintiles,” which reflect different levels of socio-economic need. The poorest schools receive more state funding than the rest.
 

What is being done to create excellent schools for all in South African children?

The primary instrument for governmental action in the post-apartheid period has been state policy. Policies have been largely symbolic, consisting of powerful statements of anti-apartheid values admired for profound and progressive pronunciations about a better society. In practice, there has been a considerable distance between policy and practice for the following reasons: low levels of capacity for implementation; high levels of corruption such as in the woefully inadequate textbook delivery system; weak accountability systems for teachers; and a strong teachers’ union allied to the ruling party, which consistently blocks any fundamental reforms of education that make stringent demands on teachers.

Then, the policy-driven reforms have focused largely on outputs (i.e., achievements on test scores), without the same attention given to the sufficiency of inputs (adequate resources, especially in poor schools) and the quality of throughputs (the educational process itself).

Finally, reform interventions at the school level, such as new curricula, consistently underestimate the levels of dysfunction in township schools (few schools have a predictable timetable) and the low levels of subject-matter competence among teachers.

The most successful interventions to reform schools happen outside of government through non-governmental organizations, religious organizations, the private sector such as large banks and accounting firms, and universities. Most of these interventions focus on improvements in physical science and mathematics education, and there is demonstrable evidence that without the impacts of these non-state initiatives, the achievements of poor township schools would be even more disastrous.

The limitations of such non-state initiatives are their limited system-wide impacts on 29,000 schools; for that you need a government that is deeply committed to educational reform beyond simply increasing the levels of funding to schools.
 

Helen, what can we learn from South Africa’s system-level change?

Racial integration in education is a gradual endeavor in societies with turbulent racial pasts. The public policy call for social cohesion, integration and democracy is not often matched in practice, where tensions, divisions and challenges remain, particularly in communities that feel disenfranchised or threatened by the aspiring social goals. Racial and socio-economic stratification persists in one form or another and continues to undermine the opportunities for all children to receive quality education.

The challenges facing the South African public education system underscore the need to approach educational change in a comprehensive, rather than a piecemeal, way. The process should pay equal attention to inputs, throughputs and outputs; that encourages public-private partnerships and school-community relationships, and focuses attention on improving the teaching force. Access to (and quality of) learning opportunity, particularly for Black students from lower and middle classes, must be at the heart of educational reform if students are to have a chance to thrive and experience upward social mobility. This is not just a matter of equity; it is critical for the democracy and the prosperity of the country as a whole.

The challenges and opportunities of South Africa present illustrative considerations for the global community. As many societies become increasingly plural and/or struggle to move away from barriers and stratifications that stifled social prosperity and advancement, educational change necessitates fresh approaches that lift up all students, and in particular, the traditionally marginalized, using education as a vehicle for positive social change.

To read more about Jansen’s and Malone’s work on equity, see Leading Educational Change: Global Issues, Challenges, and Lessons on Whole-System Reform (Teachers College Press, 2013).

 

Education World®             
Copyright © 2013 Education World

Comments